Mabux: Global Bunker Prices

LNG BUNKER PAGE
- LNG bunker indexes
- OIL/GAS futures settlements
- LNG bunker news
- LNG fuel energy content
SEE LNG BUNKER INDEXES
MARKET BUNKER PRICES (MBP)
- 400+ ports worldwide
- Bunker Price History available from 2002
- Supplier's contact details
- Price forecast short (1 day) and long (rolling forward 2 years)
- Differentials section: VLSFO/380 HSFO, VLSFO/MGO LS, MGO LS/VLSFO
See Market Bunker Prices
DIGITAL BUNKER PRICES (DBP:ICE/NYMEX)
- Price adjustments to the Bunker Market's volatility instantly
- Completely independent
- Free from price manipulations
- Unique tool to identify overcharge/undercharge prices
See Digital Bunker Prices for free

MABUX ARA LNG Bunker Index
Port LNG$/mton MGO LS$/mton Date
ARA
1 786.00
+121.00
1 420.00
+20.00
Oct 26
Click to see more LNG Bunker Indexes

Port	LNG$/mton	MGO LS$/mton	Date
ARA	1 786.00	+121.00	1 420.00	+20.00	Oct 26

MABUX Global Bunker Index

380HSFO$/mton		VLS FO$/mton		MGO LS$/mton		Date
784.71	+2.42	920.31	+4.20	1 525.30	-0.39	Nov 2

Click to see Regional Bunker Indexes

MABUX Market Differential Index (MDI)

Correlation between market bunker prices (MBP) and MABUX Digital Bunker Price Benchmark (DBP)

All Indexes in $/mton	380HSFO			VLS FO			MGO LS			Date
All Indexes in $/mton	MBP Index	DBP Index	MDI	MBP Index	DBP Index	MDI	MBP Index	DBP Index	MDI	Date
Rotterdam	722	800	-78	790	908	-118	1 420	1 636	-216	Nov 2
Singapore	913	862	+51	1 015	1 049	-34	1 275	1 629	-354	Nov 2
Fujairah	770	798	-28	989	998	-9	1 685	1 692	-7	Nov 2
Houston	630	746	-116	850	893	-43	1 400	1 484	-84	Nov 2

Click to see more details

Digital Bunker Prices
Reasons, Mechanism, Benefits
Click to view presentation

Try free for 3 days

Analytical Section
- Daily and Weekly Bunker analyses and Future Curves
- World and regional Bunker indices
- Bunker Price Forecast for 40+ ports
- Digital Bunker Prices
MABUX for Industry
- API for integration with your application, custom solutions available upon demand
- Bunker market analyses upon request for required region or port
- Bunker Price seminars that allow to learn how to use MABUX tools for bunker business
- MABUX Open Bunker Directory features contact details of bunker suppliers, traders and brokers worldwide.
Latest News
- 2026-11-02
  MABUX: Bunker Monthly Outlook, October 2026.
  October’s global bunker market remained under strong geopolitical and supply-side pressure. Middle East tensions, disruptions to oil product flows, tight regional fuel availability and rising LNG prices continued to support bunker quotations. The key... Read more October’s global bunker market remained under strong geopolitical and supply-side pressure. Middle East tensions, disruptions to oil product flows, tight regional fuel availability and rising LNG prices continued to support bunker quotations. The key market drivers included:
  
  • Middle East Conflict: Continued instability around the Strait of Hormuz sustained elevated geopolitical risk premiums, freight costs and bunker price volatility.
  • Crude Oil Supply Constraints: Disrupted Gulf oil exports, limited supply flexibility and higher transportation costs maintained upward pressure on crude and marine fuel prices.
  • Tight Distillate Supply: Restricted gasoil availability and strong refinery margins continued to support MGO LS prices, widening premiums over residual bunker fuels.
  • Regional Fuel Imbalances: Limited HSFO and VLSFO availability, particularly in Asian bunkering hubs, contributed to significant regional price differentials and changes in scrubber spreads.
  • Higher Bunker Transportation Costs: Elevated tanker freight rates constrained fuel arbitrage flows between Europe and Asia, increasing supply pressure in major bunkering hubs.
  • Rising LNG Prices: Tight global LNG supply, stronger European gas prices and seasonal demand expectations reduced LNG's competitiveness against conventional marine fuels.
  • Alternative Fuel Transition: Continued expansion of dual-fuel and battery-powered fleets supported the longer-term diversification of marine fuel demand, although high alternative fuel costs remained a constraint.
  
  In October, the MABUX 380 HSFO Index extended its upward trend, gaining USD 76.75, from USD 701.67/MT at the end of September to USD 778.42/MT. The VLSFO Index rose by USD 70.81, reaching USD 913.07/MT compared to USD 842.26/MT a month earlier, breaking above the USD 900/MT threshold. Meanwhile, the MGO LS Index recorded only a marginal increase of USD 2.62, edging up from USD 1,521.88/MT at the end of September to USD 1,524.50/MT. The upward trend in bunker prices during October was primarily driven by the continued escalation of the military conflict between the United States and Iran, which sustained a substantial geopolitical risk premium in global crude oil and refined petroleum product prices. At the time of reporting, MABUX bunker indices remained close to their peak levels, reflecting persistent geopolitical tensions and elevated uncertainty across global energy markets.
  
  The MABUX Global Scrubber Spread (SS) – the price differential between 380 HSFO and VLSFO – continued its moderate downward trend in October, declining by USD 5.94, from USD 140.59 at the end of September to USD 134.65, while remaining above the USD 100.00 SS Benchmark. The monthly average SS value also decreased by USD 23.78. In Rotterdam, the SS Spread increased by USD 11.00, from USD 57.00 at the end of September to USD 68.00, remaining below the USD 100.00 threshold. However, the monthly average SS value declined by USD 25.63. In Singapore, the 380 HSFO/VLSFO price differential narrowed by USD 35.00, from USD 125.00 in September to USD 90.00, falling below the USD 100.00 benchmark and briefly dropping to as low as USD 20.00 during the month. The port's monthly average SS value also recorded a substantial decline of USD 80.33. The continued narrowing of the SS Spread suggests that the bunker market is gradually adjusting to the prevailing geopolitical environment. With scrubber spreads falling below the psychologically significant USD 100.00 threshold in key bunkering hubs, conventional VLSFO is becoming an increasingly competitive alternative to the 380 HSFO plus scrubber combination, potentially reducing the economic advantage of scrubber-equipped vessels. We expect the SS Spread to maintain a moderately downward trend in November, although geopolitical developments and bunker fuel price volatility may continue to influence market dynamics. More detailed information is available in the Differentials section at mabux.com.
  
  In October, the ECA Spread (ES) – the price differential between ULSFO and MGO LS – in Istanbul maintained its moderately downward trend, declining by USD 5.00, from USD 75.00 at the end of September to USD 70.00. However, the index experienced significant fluctuations during the month, ranging between USD 50.00 and USD 100.00. Meanwhile, the monthly average ES value increased by USD 6.25. Overall, the ECA Spread's sustained position below the USD 100.00 threshold suggests that the market has reached a certain degree of stabilization, despite occasional short-term volatility. We expect no significant changes in the ECA Spread dynamics in November, with the index likely to remain relatively stable around its current levels. More detailed information is available in the Differentials section at mabux.com.
  
  European natural gas prices have surged amid prolonged LNG supply disruptions caused by the Iran conflict and restrictions on shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. With most Qatari LNG supplies still offline, intensified competition for alternative cargoes pushed European and Asian gas prices in September to their highest levels since the 2022–2023 energy crisis. Although Europe faces no immediate gas shortages, continued supply uncertainty is expected to keep prices elevated, increasing energy costs for households and industry throughout the winter.
  
  As of October 29, European underground natural gas storage levels continued to increase moderately, reaching 74.89% of total capacity, up 3.63 percentage points from 71.26% at the end of September. Current storage levels were 13.43 percentage points above the beginning-of-year level of 61.46%, but remained below those recorded during the same period last year.
  Meanwhile, the European natural gas benchmark TTF recorded a sharp increase in October, surging by EUR 24.650/MWh, from EUR 73.938/MWh in September to EUR 98.588/MWh. On October 28, the TTF benchmark briefly exceeded the psychologically significant EUR 100.000/MWh threshold, reflecting heightened volatility and persistent upward pressure on European natural gas prices.
  
  The price of LNG as a bunker fuel at the port of Sines (Portugal) continued its upward trend in October, rising by USD 401 (USD 2,009/MT compared to USD 1,608/MT at the end of September). Meanwhile, the price differential between LNG and conventional fuel remained in favour of conventional fuel, widening sharply to USD 425 (compared to USD 69 in favour of conventional fuel in September). At the end of October, MGO LS was quoted at USD 1,594/MT in the port of Sines. More detailed information is available in the “LNG Bunkering” section at mabux.com.
  
  In October, the MABUX Market Differential Index (MDI) – which reflects the correlation between Market Bunker Prices (MBP) and the MABUX Digital Bunker Price Benchmark (DBP) – showed the following trends across the world's four major bunkering hubs: Rotterdam, Singapore, Fujairah and Houston.
  
  In the 380 HSFO segment, Fujairah returned to the undervalued zone, joining Rotterdam and Houston. Average weekly undervaluation levels narrowed by 10 points in Rotterdam and 40 points in Houston, while widening by 11 points in Fujairah. Meanwhile, Singapore shifted into the overvalued zone, becoming the only overvalued port in this fuel segment, with its average premium increasing by 86 points. Houston's MDI remained above the USD 100.00 mark, while Fujairah's MDI approached the MBP/DBP price parity level.
  
  In the VLSFO segment, Fujairah remained the only overvalued port, although its average premium declined by 19 points. The other three ports stayed in the undervalued zone. Average undervaluation levels widened by 39 points in Rotterdam, remained unchanged in Singapore, and narrowed by 15 points in Houston. Rotterdam's MDI exceeded the USD 100.00 threshold.
  
  In the MGO LS segment, Fujairah shifted into the overvalued zone, becoming the only overvalued port in this fuel category, with its average premium surging by 112 points. The remaining three ports continued to be undervalued. Average undervaluation levels widened by 90 points in Rotterdam and 7 points in Singapore, while narrowing by 11 points in Houston. MDI values in Rotterdam, Singapore and Houston remained above the USD 100.00 mark.
  
  Overall, the balance between bunker fuel overvaluation and undervaluation across the world's key bunkering hubs remained mixed in October, with undervaluation continuing to dominate all three fuel segments. The most notable changes were Singapore's shift into the overvalued zone in the 380 HSFO segment and Fujairah's transition to overvaluation in the MGO LS segment. Meanwhile, undervaluation intensified primarily in Rotterdam across the VLSFO and MGO LS segments, whereas Houston recorded narrowing discounts across all three fuel grades. Significant discrepancies between MBP and DBP, exceeding USD 100.00 in several ports, indicate persistent imbalances between market bunker prices and the MABUX digital benchmark. Looking ahead to November, we expect MDI dynamics to remain mixed, with an overall predominance of undervaluation, amid ongoing geopolitical uncertainty and volatility in global energy markets.
  
  More detailed information on the correlation between market bunker prices and the MABUX digital benchmark is available in the Digital Bunker Prices section at mabux.com.
  
  Other Global Bunkering Trends:
  
  • EU Methane Regulation: The European Parliament backed a three-year delay to key requirements for oil, gas and coal importers, extending the European Commission’s proposed one-year postponement. The extension would not apply to imports restricted by EU sanctions.
  • Dual-Fuel Fleet: According to the World Shipping Council (WSC), the global dual-fuel fleet expanded by 41% year-on-year to 503 vessels, with another 849 on order, bringing the combined total to 1,352 ships.
  • LNG Bunkering: Wood Mackenzie forecasts that LNG will displace over 400,000 barrels per day of conventional oil-based bunker demand by 2030, becoming the main driver of marine fuel demand growth during the near-term energy transition.
  • Nuclear-Powered Shipping: Lloyd’s Register and the British Ports Association urged ports to prepare for advanced nuclear technologies, including nuclear-powered vessels and small modular reactors (SMRs). Regulatory, insurance and safety challenges remain major obstacles.
  • Battery-Powered Fleet: According to ZESTAs, the number of battery-powered ships in operation or under construction has surged by 258% since 2023. As of October 2026, 2,124 vessels were operational, with another 925 under construction.
  • Global shipbuilding order book: According to BIMCO, the global shipbuilding order book rose by 13% year-on-year to 203.2 million CGT, remaining close to May’s record high of 210.4 million CGT. China continues to dominate the sector, securing 74% of new orders over the past year and accounting for 64% of the global order book, followed by South Korea (19%) and Japan (6%).
  
  MABUX expects the global bunker market to maintain a firm but highly volatile trend in November, with geopolitical risks and supply constraints continuing to outweigh weakening demand fundamentals. MGO LS and LNG are likely to face the strongest upward price pressure, while HSFO and VLSFO may show mixed regional movements.
  Source: MABUX
- 2026-11-02
  Oil slips more than 1% as talks continue on ending Iran war
  Oil prices slipped more than 1% on Monday after Iranian and Qatari officials held a third straight day of talks aimed at pushing for a deal to end the US-Israeli war on Iran. Brent crude futures fell $1.59, or 1.40%, to $111.84 a barrel by 0011 GMT... Read more Oil prices slipped more than 1% on Monday after Iranian and Qatari officials held a third straight day of talks aimed at pushing for a deal to end the US-Israeli war on Iran.
  
  Brent crude futures fell $1.59, or 1.40%, to $111.84 a barrel by 0011 GMT while US West Texas Intermediate crude was at $102.56 a barrel, down $1.56, or 1.50%.
  
  Brent ended October at its highest level in six months amid concerns that the US-Iran conflict could escalate again after Tuesday’s US midterm elections.
  
  "Oil is seeing a technical pullback this morning after last week’s strong gains," said Tim Waterer, chief ⁠market analyst at KCM Trade.
  
  "Lingering hopes of some form of diplomatic progress, combined with the absence of any meaningful military escalation over the weekend, have taken some of the immediate heat out of prices for now."
  
  However, the market remained alert to the possibility that rhetoric around Iran could be ratcheted higher and push Brent toward $120 after the midterm elections, Waterer said.
  
  Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Sunday that the purpose of the "ongoing and progressing" talks was to continue consultations with the Qatari mediators, adding Tehran is prepared for "both defence and diplomacy".
  
  The talks come amid attacks on oil tankers transiting the Strait of Hormuz that are driving up global energy and shipping costs. In October, Saudi Arabia increased crude exports versus September despite attacks by the Iran-aligned Yemeni Houthis on its energy infrastructure, two of three ship-tracking companies said.
  
  The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and allies including Russia, or OPEC+, kept December production targets steady on Sunday, confirming expectations that more policy adjustments will not occur until next year, as the group continues to struggle with export disruptions from the Iran war.
  
  Source: Reuters/Investing.com
- 2026-11-02
  Oil Prices No Longer Follow Headlines
  A month ago, a series of news reports said oil flows out of Hormuz had recovered to pre-war levels, pushing oil prices lower. However, the rout did not last. Benchmarks are set for their fourth monthly gain in a row, and no amount of repeating that Gulf... Read more A month ago, a series of news reports said oil flows out of Hormuz had recovered to pre-war levels, pushing oil prices lower. However, the rout did not last. Benchmarks are set for their fourth monthly gain in a row, and no amount of repeating that Gulf states are exporting even more oil than before the war can change that. Because barrels are not the whole story.
  
  “What is the price of oil? Eight months into the war with Iran, what should be a straightforward question has become surprisingly hard to answer,” JP Morgan’s head of global commodities, Natasha Kaneva, said as quoted by the Wall Street Journal this week. The publication noted that Kaneva’s own oil price model suggests a fair value of $94 for a barrel of Brent crude.
  
  Yet Brent crude is trading at over $116 per barrel.
  
  This is only confusing on the surface. Below it, we find an abundance of risks for those shipping crude oil out of the Persian Gulf, dozens of tankers getting hit with drones or missiles in the past few weeks, and a shortage of tankers resulting from Saudi Arabia’s shift to ship-to-ship transfers off the coast of Oman to reduce the risk of having its tankers blown up in Hormuz or the Red Sea.
  
  Stemming from all this is the issue of shipping costs for crude oil produced in the Middle East. These have soared to all-time highs and prompted producing countries to discount their oil in order to stimulate demand—even though all those reports about improving oil flows in the Persian Gulf served to pressure oil prices. This is because those flows cannot be sustained, not in an environment where the risk of a missile attack is so high.
  Related: Japan to Overtake China As World’s Top LNG Importer This Year
  
  “This recovery has coincided with a sharp deterioration in maritime security as vessels remain exposed to attacks and insurance and freight costs have risen sharply,” UBS commodity strategist Giovanni Staunovo said, as quoted by the Wall Street Journal.
  
  The war premium on oil, in other words, is alive and well. Yet it is not the only factor driving prices. In the early weeks of the war, some observers were surprised that oil prices were not soaring higher. Indeed, the initial reaction of the oil market to the war was a really optimistic one. Traders—and pretty much everyone else—were sure it wouldn’t last more than a few weeks, and the world was awash with oil, so it had a solid supply cushion.
  
  Yet that modest price increase only took place on the futures market. On the physical market, oil surged. It took several months for futures and physical prices to begin converging, but it appears this is what might be happening right now, with physical prices off their highs from earlier this year. The problem for those hoping for sub-$100 Brent is that eight months into the war, the global supply cushion is gone, the prospect for peace remains elusive, and drivers are paying record-high prices for diesel. The price of oil is reflecting all of this, unlike it did three months ago, when it was being moved primarily by President Trump’s Truth Social posts and reports citing unnamed sources as saying peace was close.
  
  Oil prices currently reflect the reality that the world’s energy supply crunch is not going to be over soon. Even the head of the International Energy Agency, Fatih Birol, said earlier this week the disruption will likely continue well into next year. “I am afraid I don't see any credible pathway that the markets will go next year, where we were before this war has started,” Birol said. He also said the crisis would fuel the acceleration of what he called “The Age of Electricity,” but some have doubts about it—electricity prices are still quite closely tied to the prices of the hydrocarbons that generate most of the world’s electricity.
  
  In addition to all existing trends and developments, prices are stuck above $100 per barrel because of the anticipation of future developments, and more specifically the potential escalation between the United States, Israel, and Iran. President Trump has on several occasions admitted he was considering a return to hostilities after the November 3rd midterms. Iran has responded with its own threats that any return to a hot war would prompt retaliation. In other words, both sides are ready to resume fighting, despite ongoing efforts at diplomacy from Gulf states and Pakistan.
  
  The midterms are next Tuesday. What follows after them is anyone’s guess but it appears most expect a renewal of hostilities in the Persian Gulf. And that means a higher war premium and a further extension of the energy supply disruption that has become the defining event of this year. Whatever analyst models may suggest, prices are going to stay higher until there is a clear sign that peace is a real possibility. Source: Oilprice.com
- 2026-11-02
  MABUX: Global bunker market to resume upward trend on Nov.02.
  The MABUX World Bunker Index — a composite benchmark reflecting daily prices for 380 HSFO, VLSFO, and MGO – showed mixed dynamics on October 30, with changes remaining relatively moderate across all three fuel segments: 380 HSFO: USD/MT: 782.29 (+5.01) VLSFO:... Read more The MABUX World Bunker Index — a composite benchmark reflecting daily prices for 380 HSFO, VLSFO, and MGO – showed mixed dynamics on October 30, with changes remaining relatively moderate across all three fuel segments:
  
  380 HSFO: USD/MT: 782.29 (+5.01)
  VLSFO: USD/MT: 916.11 (+4.76)
  MGO: USD/MT: 1 525.69 (-6.08)
  
  As of Oct. 30, the MABUX Market Differential Index (MDI), which monitors the spread between Market Bunker Prices (MBP) and the MABUX Digital Bunker Benchmark (DBP), recorded the following trends across the four major global bunkering hubs—Rotterdam, Singapore, Fujairah, and Houston:
  
  • HSFO segment: Singapore remained the only overvalued port, with its MDI premium widening by $13. The other three hubs continued to be undervalued, although their MDI discounts narrowed by $5 in Rotterdam, $10 in Fujairah, and $17 in Houston. Notably, Houston's MDI discount dropped below the $100 threshold.
  
  • VLSFO segment: Fujairah moved into the overvalued zone, becoming the only overpriced hub, with its MDI premium increasing by $9. The remaining three ports stayed undervalued, with MDI discounts narrowing by $20 in Rotterdam, $25 in Singapore, and $6 in Houston. Rotterdam's MDI discount remained above the $100 mark, while Fujairah hovered near the 100% correlation level between MBP and DBP.
  
  • MGO LS segment: Fujairah maintained its position as the only overvalued hub, with its MDI premium widening further by $34. The other three ports remained undervalued, although their MDI discounts narrowed by $34 in Rotterdam, $31 in Singapore, and $14 in Houston. MDI discounts in Rotterdam and Singapore remained above the $100 threshold, while Houston's discount fell below this level.
  
  MABUX expects the global bunker market to resume its upward trend on Nov.02:
  380 HSFO: plus 5-10 USD/MT, VLSFO: plus 5-10 USD/MT, MGO LS: plus 5–20 USD/MT.
  Source: MABUX
- 2026-11-02
  Azerbaijan’s Renewable Energy Boom Is Transforming Its Power Sector
  Azerbaijan, long known as a major oil and gas power, has ventured into renewable energy in recent years and is rapidly ramping up its capacity. As host of COP29, Azerbaijan’s government announced an ambitious climate target and encouraged other governments... Read more Azerbaijan, long known as a major oil and gas power, has ventured into renewable energy in recent years and is rapidly ramping up its capacity. As host of COP29, Azerbaijan’s government announced an ambitious climate target and encouraged other governments to do the same.
  
  Renewable energy contributed 20 per cent of Azerbaijan’s total electricity production in the first nine months of the year, an increase from 13.4 per cent in 2025, marking a significant achievement in capacity growth. Azerbaijan produced 21.2 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity between January and September 2026, compared with 28.7 billion kilowatt-hours for the whole of 2025, according to official figures.
  
  The government plans to increase the share of renewables in its total installed electricity generation capacity to 33.3 per cent by 2027. Azerbaijan has an estimated technical renewable energy potential of 135 GW onshore and 157 GW of offshore wind capacity in the Caspian Sea, providing substantial opportunities for solar and wind development. The government aims to develop 8 GW of renewable energy generation capacity by 2032, with 2 GW expected to be completed by 2027.
  
  Some regions of the country are transitioning to green energy far more quickly than others, with the Nakhchivan Autonomous Republic meeting 100 per cent of its electricity demand from renewable sources between 21st April and 2nd July, according to Azerbaijan’s Energy Minister Parviz Shahbazov.
  
  The growth of the country’s renewable energy capacity, mainly driven by the expansion of solar and wind projects, enabled Azerbaijan to avoid using an estimated 840 million cubic meters of natural gas during the first nine months of the year, thereby helping reduce the country’s carbon emissions from fossil fuels.
  
  Azerbaijan is accelerating the development of solar and wind farms to meet its ambitious clean energy targets, with plans to commission 11 solar and wind power plants totalling 2 gigawatts of capacity. Three facilities, with a combined capacity of 570 MW, have already come online. The government expects to commission the 445-MW Bilasuvar solar power plant and the 25-megawatt Shams 1 solar power plant by the end of the year.
  
  Work is already well underway on UAE-based Masdar’s 200-MW wind power project. Meanwhile, several more renewable energy projects are expected to be completed next year, including the 315-MW Neftchala, 240-MW Shafag, 50-MW Shams, 50-MW Ufug, and 25-MW Western Ufug solar power plants. The planned projects are expected to produce a combined 5 billion kilowatt-hours of electricity a year, which could reduce gas use by more than 1.1 billion cubic meters a year and cut carbon emissions by 2.4 million metric tonnes.
  
  The accelerated deployment of renewable energy in Azerbaijan has been largely driven by high levels of foreign direct investment, which have surpassed $500 million. Companies from the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and China all have large-scale green energy projects in Azerbaijan. The country’s Energy Minister, Parviz Shahbazov, said that renewable energy auctions are expected to commence in 2028 to spur further development.
  
  In October, the European Union’s Business Climate Report Azerbaijan 2025/26 highlighted the progress that the country has made in expanding its renewable energy sector in recent years. It states, “According to European companies participating in the survey, Azerbaijan has made significant progress in developing its renewable energy sector and is actively engaging international project developers to implement large-scale projects.”
  
  The government is also supporting significant investment in Azerbaijan’s battery energy storage systems and electricity grid upgrades, including the AZURE project, the Navoi substation and new 500-kilovolt transmission lines. Azerbaijan plans to invest around $2.6 billion in renewable energy projects and power grid development by 2027, including $600 million to strengthen the grid infrastructure, according to Shahbazov.
  
  These projects will help improve the flexibility of Azerbaijan’s power system, according to the report. The government also plans to develop domestic manufacturing capabilities in green energy, with a solar panel manufacturing project underway and plans for wind turbine blade and tower manufacturing projects in the Alat Free Economic Zone.
  
  While Azerbaijan does not currently have a nuclear power programme, the government is also considering eventually developing the sector. In April, Shahbazov announced, “We are moving to a new model and will ensure energy security not only through hydrocarbons, but also through electricity, including renewable sources. In addition, we have decided to include nuclear energy in our energy balance, as we consider it a clean energy source and an important component of the future energy balance,” during an energy panel session at the Antalya Diplomacy Forum.
  
  To support these efforts, the International Atomic Energy Agency conducted a legislative assistance mission to Azerbaijan in late 2025, in cooperation with the State Agency for Regulation of Nuclear and Radiological Activity. The aim was to raise awareness of the importance of adhering to the relevant international legal instruments and the elements of comprehensive national nuclear legislation.
  
  Azerbaijan is accelerating the deployment of new renewable energy capacity and strengthening supporting infrastructure to ensure its energy system is both flexible and reliable. This is expected to help the country decrease dependence on oil and gas in the coming years. Meanwhile, the government is considering developing a nuclear power programme to further diversify the energy mix.
  
  Source: Oilprice.com
- 2026-11-02
  Chevron Raises Exploration Spending By 50%
  After years of focusing on growing exploration and production in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and the Permian shale basin, U.S. oil and gas supermajor Chevron returns to high-impact frontier exploration as it seeks to renew its portfolio with diverse opportunities... Read more After years of focusing on growing exploration and production in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico and the Permian shale basin, U.S. oil and gas supermajor Chevron returns to high-impact frontier exploration as it seeks to renew its portfolio with diverse opportunities globally.
  
  Exploration in South America, Africa, and the Eastern Mediterranean is now a key focus of Chevron’s upstream business, which the company looks to turn around by adding reserves and production growth opportunities in Guyana, Angola, Namibia, Nigeria, Guinea-Bissau, Equatorial Guinea, Egypt, and the Eastern Mediterranean.
  
  The U.S. supermajor is boosting its exploration spending in its revived exploration program, led by vice president of exploration, Kevin McLachlan, who took over the exploration arm last year. Chevron recruited McLachlan from France’s TotalEnergies, where earlier this decade the executive oversaw work at one of the biggest and most promising recent discoveries in a frontier area—the Venus discovery in Namibia’s offshore Orange Basin.
  
  Chevron has been aggressively adding exploration acreage over the past two years. This strategy to turn to frontier exploration has been vindicated by this year’s geopolitical and energy market turmoil.
  
  The Iran war and the disruption of oil and gas flows in the Strait of Hormuz laid bare the vulnerability of relying on a single region for large supplies while global oil demand is set to grow in the coming years.
  Related: Japan to Overtake China As World’s Top LNG Importer This Year
  
  Supermajors need to add to their reserves base to offset declines at existing assets over time. At the same time, “the Middle East conflict has highlighted the concentration risk involved in focusing on geopolitically unstable regions,” analysts at Wood Mackenzie said earlier this year.
  
  “The need for portfolio renewal and diversification is raising upstream firms’ appetite for exploration risk,” they added, noting that oil and gas companies are taking on more exposure and positioning earlier in their respective exploration targets.
  
  Exploration budgets have room to rise, especially in light of the windfall profits companies are raking in this year amid the spike in oil and gas prices following the Iran war.
  
  Chevron, specifically, is raising its exploration budget this year by 50% compared to last year, McLachlan told the Financial Times in an interview in September.
  
  This year, Chevron’s spending on exploration could top $1.5 billion, up from just below $1 billion in 2025.
  
  “We needed to increase the spend because we just didn’t have the exposure,” McLachlan told FT.
  
  “So we’ve increased our spend on seismic data, which is the enabling piece of how to generate prospects, without which you can’t generate ideas.”
  
  Two years ago, Chevron was drilling about 10 exploration wells per year. Its program for 2027 includes drilling 20 exploration wells and possibly up to six appraisal wells, the executive said.
  
  In a more recent interview with The Wall Street Journal this month, McLachlan said that about 50% of the exploration budget is now being invested in undeveloped frontier basins, up from 20% a few years ago.
  
  In just a year, Chevron has significantly raised exploration acreage and has announced discoveries in West Africa.
  
  In August last year, Chevron’s CEO Mike Wirth told analysts at the Q2 2025 earnings call, “I'm not happy with the results out of exploration over the last few years, but I want to acknowledge our exploration team has been operating in a pretty narrow range.”
  
  At this year’s Q2 earnings call, Wirth said that Chevron has now built “the largest and highest quality opportunity set that we’ve had in years, probably in my time in this role.”
  
  Chevron increased exploration acreage by 35% over the past year, Wirth said, adding that “We haven't had this deep of an inventory of opportunity.”
  
  The company has announced in recent months discoveries in Nigeria and Angola, and plans to drill the Nabba-1X exploration well in Namibia by the end of the year, as part of a high-impact, multi-well exploration program across the region.
  
  Commenting on the Angola discovery and the broader exploration campaign,
  
  McLachlan said, “Every successful well adds information, confidence and potential pathways for future growth.” Source: Oilprice.com
- 2026-11-02
  Europe Is Now Seriously Rethinking Its Oil Refinery Phase Down
  Over the past couple of decades, Europe has pursued some of the world’s most ambitious clean energy policies, aiming to become the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Hardly surprisingly, Europe is now further along the clean energy transition compared... Read more Over the past couple of decades, Europe has pursued some of the world’s most ambitious clean energy policies, aiming to become the first climate-neutral continent by 2050. Hardly surprisingly, Europe is now further along the clean energy transition compared to its western peers, with renewables accounting for roughly half of the continent’s power mix compared to about 26% by the U.S. However, Europe is now being forced to reckon with its decision to ditch some of its fossil fuel assets as yet another global energy crisis unfolds just years after the 2022 energy crisis. Over the past 20 years, Europe has aggressively phased down its oil refineries, shutting down about a quarter of its plants and reducing processing capacity by roughly 10%, with EU policymakers anticipating that the green transition would steadily shrink domestic demand for gasoline and diesel. A lot of the attrition was driven by onerous environmental rules and harsh penalties for non-compliance. To wit, under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS), refineries face a declining cap on carbon emissions and receive fewer free pollution allowances over time, sharply increasing the cost of operating their facilities, while stricter environmental rules and pollution limits under the Industrial Emissions Directive (IED) mandate expensive retrofits and continuous compliance costs for heavy polluters, negatively impacting oil refining margins.
  
  Consequently, the continent has been forced to rely more heavily on imported refined products, exposing it to geopolitical risks. The Iran and Ukraine wars have led to a spike in oil and gas prices, with EU Energy Commissioner Dan Jørgensen terming geopolitical instability and the prolonged diesel squeeze a “wake-up call” for the bloc. European natural gas prices shot past €100 per megawatt-hour on Friday, the highest level since Russia invaded Ukraine in 2022, as Middle East disruptions choked off LNG supplies through the Strait of Hormuz and on fears of a renewed hot war after the U.S. midterm elections. The energy shock has added more than €100 billion, or about $111 billion, to the continent’s import bills, exposing the vulnerabilities of dismantling domestic fossil-fuel infrastructure before clean alternatives were ready to handle a worst-case scenario.
  
  Central European nations like Poland, Czechia, and Slovakia have been pressuring the European Commission to establish a long-term protective strategy for Europe’s oil refineries. They have called for refineries to be protected from carbon leakage and given access to EU funds to upgrade. They have argued that the EU’s strict climate rules could leave the bloc too dependent on foreign fuel imports, and demanded that Europe’s ETS should adequately factor in the international competition refineries face, easing administrative and financial conditions that hinder facility upgrades.
  
  And now, Brussels is looking to rethink its long-standing approach to the domestic oil-refining industry. On Wednesday, the European Commission launched the first High-Level Dialogue with the European oil refining sector. Co-chaired by Dan Jørgensen (Commissioner for Energy and Housing) and Andrius Kubilius (Commissioner for Defence and Space), the forum discussed Europe’s energy security, industrial competitiveness and defense readiness amid recurring geopolitical disruptions. Participants mapped out short-term responses to supply disruptions stemming from ongoing conflicts in the Middle East, noting that EU refineries currently supply approximately 70% of jet fuel and 85% of diesel consumed across Europe.
  
  The initiative took a serious look at the security implications of Europe’s energy crisis, with Commissioner Kubilius emphasizing that fuel supplies are crucial for military mobility and overall defense readiness. Under NATO’s force readiness models, the alliance must be capable of deploying and fully supplying 100,000 troops within the first 10 days of a crisis, creating a large and sudden demand for tactical fuel.
  
  The concern here is that crude oil imports cannot simply replace refined products during an active conflict if processing infrastructure is missing. Under the AccelerateEU framework, the EU will now revise current regulations to ensure strategic fuel stocks are easily accessible for military operations in exceptional circumstances. Kubilius also called for more resilient fuel infrastructure and for the expansion of the Cold War-era Central Europe Pipeline System to improve supply lines to the eastern flank.
  
  Interestingly, the Commission also announced plans for a joint roadmap with the industry on the sector’s transformation, including investment in alternative fuels such as biofuels and e-fuels.
  
  The policy pivot introduces a friction point between the bloc’s defense requirements and the EU’s long-term green transition. The EU now has to perform a delicate balancing act that addresses these harsh realities while pursuing its climate goals Source: Oilprice.com
- 2026-11-02
  Japan to Overtake China As World’s Top LNG Importer This Year
  Japan is expected to overtake China as the world’s largest importer of liquefied natural gas (LNG) this year, for the first time since 2022, as high LNG prices and sufficient storage in China limit purchases, analysts at ICIS and Kpler say. Japan’s... Read more Japan is expected to overtake China as the world’s largest importer of liquefied natural gas (LNG) this year, for the first time since 2022, as high LNG prices and sufficient storage in China limit purchases, analysts at ICIS and Kpler say.
  
  Japan’s LNG demand will exceed, albeit slightly, demand in China, according to estimates by the consultancies compiled by Reuters. Imports into Japan are estimated at 62 million metric tons, while Chinese imports are expected at 61 million tons this year, according to ICIS. Kpler also sees a small edge of Japan over China in imports this year, at 63 million tons for Japan compared to 62 million tons for China.
  
  China became the world’s biggest LNG importer in 2021, but the extended Chinese restrictions during two years of COVID-related lockdowns in the country pushed Japan to the top spot again in 2022.
  
  China then regained the top importer status in 2023, and this extended into 2025.
  
  This year, amid the Strait of Hormuz crisis, which halted LNG shipments out of Qatar and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), overall LNG import demand in Asia has plunged due to the high prices of spot cargoes in a suddenly tight market.
  
  The Chinese decline, however, is set to be more prominent, allowing Japan to overtake China this year.
  
  Chinese LNG buyers acted early to build gas stockpiles amid the Iran war, helping Beijing stock up enough inventories ahead of the winter.
  
  As of the end of September, China’s underground gas storage was 80% full, according to Rystad Energy’s analyst Xiong Wei.
  
  Lower demand for spot supply from China this winter could mean relief for other LNG customers in Asia and Europe, many of which have been struggling with high spot LNG prices and intensified competition for supply that doesn’t need to transit the Strait of Hormuz.
  
  Japan, for its part, this summer reduced gas-fired generation in favor of coal as the price of liquefied natural gas remained elevated. LNG prices surged in Asia to a four-year high as very few cargoes manage to exit the Strait of Hormuz while competition with Europe for winter supply is intensifying. Source: Oilprice.com
- 2026-11-02
  European Gas Tops 101 Euros for First Time Since 2022
  Europe’s benchmark natural gas prices have topped 101 euros per megawatt-hour (MWh) for the first time since the 2022 crisis as winter looms amid historically low European gas storage levels. The front-month price at the Dutch Title Transfer Facility... Read more Europe’s benchmark natural gas prices have topped 101 euros per megawatt-hour (MWh) for the first time since the 2022 crisis as winter looms amid historically low European gas storage levels.
  
  The front-month price at the Dutch Title Transfer Facility (TTF), the benchmark for Europe’s gas trading, surged by 4% as of 9 a.m. in Amsterdam on Friday. The TTF price was on track for an 8% weekly gain amid mounting concerns that the escalation in the Middle East would continue to choke off Qatari and Emirati LNG flows through the Strait of Hormuz.
  
  At 101.82 euros ($114) per MWh early on Friday, the European benchmark price topped the 100-euro mark for the first time since 2022, during the previous gas crisis when Russia cut off pipeline gas supply to most of its European customers after Putin invaded Ukraine.
  
  EU storage sites were only 74.89% full as of October 29, per data from Gas Infrastructure Europe. That’s well below the five-year average of about 86% for this time of the year so close to the start of the heating season.
  
  As temperatures drop and the heating season begins, it’s unlikely that the storage would go further up from here during the coming winter as withdrawals have started in a number of countries.
  
  Furthermore, QatarEnergy this week extended the force majeure on LNG deliveries to the end of the year, leaving Europe and Asia without certain term supply heading into the winter.
  
  “The market has moved higher, with little sign of imminent relief in Persian Gulf LNG flows. If anything, the outlook appears more dire amid the risk of renewed US strikes on Iran following the US midterm elections next week,” Warren Patterson, Head of Commodities Strategy at ING, said in a Thursday note.
  
  Qatar’s extended force majeure means that “LNG supply disruptions are creeping deeper into the heating season,” Patterson said, noting that several unplanned outages in Norway are also adding to Europe’s supply concerns. Source: Oilprice.com
- 2026-11-02
  Japan to Tap $7 Billion from Government Fund to Subsidize Gasoline Prices
  Japan’s government on Friday decided to tap $7 billion from its contingency reserves to keep subsidies for gasoline and other fuels, even as it plans to gradually scale back the support from December. The Japanese government decided today to allocate... Read more Japan’s government on Friday decided to tap $7 billion from its contingency reserves to keep subsidies for gasoline and other fuels, even as it plans to gradually scale back the support from December.
  
  The Japanese government decided today to allocate about $7 billion (1.1 trillion Japanese yen) from the reserve funds to continue capping retail gasoline prices amid soaring oil and fuel import costs, Japanese media reported.
  
  Introduced in March, soon after the war in the Middle East began, the subsidy program has kept the average national gasoline price at 170 yen per liter, or $1.08 per liter, equivalent to about $4.10 per gallon.
  
  However, the subsidies for gasoline, diesel, and jet fuel are costing Tokyo several billion dollars every month, increasingly weighing on Japan’s public finances.
  
  So on Thursday, Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said the government would begin scaling back the subsidies by raising the cap on the retail gasoline price by 5 yen, or $0.032, per liter every month. Takaichi, however, wouldn’t say when the government would fully phase out the subsidy program.
  
  Japan has been among the countries most vulnerable to the fallout from the Middle Eastern war because of its lack of domestic energy resources, the resulting significant dependence on imports for its energy, and the sheer degree of the war-related disruption.
  
  Before the war, Japan’s dependence on crude from the Middle East passing through the Strait of Hormuz was more than 90% of all crude imports. Of the Middle Eastern supplies, about 70% typically arrived in Japan on tankers traveling through the Strait of Hormuz.
  
  Japan’s oil import bill has soared to record highs following the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, the spike in crude oil prices, and skyrocketing freight and insurance costs.
  
  The G-7 economy has also moved to release crude from its strategic reserves as part of an IEA-coordinated global effort to release 400 million barrels of crude and oil products. Source: Oilprice.com

Buy subscriptions via